Tuesday, March 17, 2009
Leonardo, Donatello, Michelangelo and Rafael chasing the foot and saving April O'Neil for 95 minutes; who could not but fail to see how totally tubular the turtles are? If you enjoyed the 80's cartoon, you'll love this film. If you didn't enjoy the 80's cartoon, you'll love this film. The Puppetry by Jim Henson, brings out a realistic, albeit teddy-bearish, element to the turtles that no CGI can do.
One of Tim Burton's best, this dark film brought out the black part of Batman's heart that most other tellings of his story had left out. Michael Keaton opposite Jack Nicholson is a magic spell waiting to be cast. Could there be a better Joker than Jack Nicholson? (He is, in fact, the joker in his everyday life) The answer, no.
Beautifully American. This film speaks volumes without saying much. Kevin Spacey and Annette Bening portray the typical suburban family, each adding a touch of their own mad brilliance to their role. Sam Mendes created a true work of art and a lovely American tale. Laugh out loud, and feel just a little guilty doing it. When this happens, you've realized the truth and beauty that is American Beauty.
Edward Norton is captivating from the moment he enters the screen. While the story of the Hulk can be brutally anticipated, Norton under the direction of Louis Leterrier, brings The Incredible Hulk to a surprising level of originality and intrigue. Beginning in Brazil, quite clearly a lead off of the 2003 version with Eric Bana, Bruce Banner travels through the Americas in order to escape the U.S. military and keep safe those he loves. Even though I was mildly let down by the climactic battle between the Hulk and The Abomination, I give the film four out of five for the sheer surprise of it.
George Clooney returns with the whole crew minus Julia Roberts and Catherine Zeta-Jones (perhaps a better film for it) to pull off a revenge job on the guy who screwed Elliot Gould’s character Rueben out of millions and put him (indirectly so) on his deathbed. The film had no lack in disguises – including an astoundingly crafted prosthetic nose for Matt Damon – and dynamic plot twists – including a partnership with a long time rival. While the surprises were no match for those of eleven, the banter was clever and the camaraderie contagious.
It appears to be 28 Days Later in New York City, yet there is enough intrigue in Will Smith’s character Robert Neville and his determination to find a cure for a disease brought on by a (Ironically) British scientist who discovers a cure for cancer. While Smith lacks the punch of Independence Day or Men In Black and the conviction of Pursuit of Happyness or Seven Pounds, director Frances Lawrence leads Smith to bring Neville to a place of some conviction and some punch leaving the audience to care in the end. I give the film a 3 out of 5 stars because of its lack originality and its mild entertainment.
Hugh Jackman, a real live Ausie, slips seamlessly into the character of a hot-blooded man with the heart of a lion. Acting along slide Nicole Kidman who remains a strong steadfast woman throughout the film portraying an English lady come abroad to investigate property in the land down under. The connection between the characters carries into every scene riding with the epic proportions of the plot. This film, in its 165 minutes literally has everything: romance, action, comedy, tragedy, and a Hollywood ending with a bittersweet flavor. It is understandable that many critics leave their viewing unsatisfied; this film does not offer more the entertainment and emotion evocation and eye candy, but it does so exquisitely.
Subtle and eloquent, Pitt and Blanchett piece together this remarkable fictitious love story of a man born old and who must grow backwards. While the film reaches 3 hours, the passage of time sifts by as you witness the life of Benjamin Button. I give this movie five stories for its originality and beautiful transition from short story to script to film.
Monday, March 16, 2009
Having not read the books myself, I worry that I may not have the breakdown correctly, but I think it goes something like this: The film The Chronicles of Narnia: The Lion, the Witch and the Wardrobe consists of the novels The Magician’s Nephew, The Lion the witch and the Wardrobe and The Horse and His Boy. The Film’s sequel The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian consisted of the novels Prince Caspian, The voyage of the Dawn Treader, the Silver Chair and The Last Battle. I thought it important to include this information so that potential views would be aware that despite the fact that there are seven books, there will be no more than the two movies. My impression of this film is thus: entertaining, fantastical, and crammed. I wanted it to be so much better, knowing the intricate detail of the novels and the amazing story that it is. However my let down was not unexpected. The intriguing addition of Prince Caspian, portrayed by Ben Barnes, spiced the film with a new element and introduced the audience to a previously absent kingdom of Telmar, that which Prince Caspian should rightly rule if not for his devious and power-hungry uncle. Peter, Susan, Edmund and Lucy return to Narnia to find their magical kingdom void of all the mystical delights they had defended 1300 years before (in Narnia time). On their quest to discover what has happened the regal children meet Prince Caspian and the foreseeable results follow: Peter and Prince Caspian become rivals while Susan and Prince Caspian form some kind of adolescent unfulfilled love affair (something that should have played a more pivotal role in the plot but was instead left to the distant margins). There were scores of new mythological creatures (being that all the other had died in the1300 years had past for all but 4 of the characters) including an agile mouse equipped with a rapier who may have been inspired by either Robin Hood or Puss in Boots: a positively delightful character. The final battle was only what could be described as traditionally entertaining, if not slightly drawn out. There are scenes clearly present merely because they occurred in one of the four novels constituted in the film. Unfortunately, they direly needed to be edited out. Unnecessary additions like these did not help the flow of the film, nor did they better tell the story. From a viewer’s perspective, there was much that clotted the story. However, despite these negative aspects, I rate the film a shaky four out of five stars because, honestly, I was entertained, and true to the form of any fantasy story, The Chronicles of Narnia: Prince Caspian had a moral message about courage in the face of oblivion and selflessness over selfishness. I am a sucker for a message, especially when communicated through epic battles and talking animals.